Alito Pick: Trick, not Treat, for Oregonians
(Portland, OR) – Rebecca Green, Constituency Development Director of NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon, announced that the organization opposes President Bush’s nomination of Samuel Alito, Jr. to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. “In choosing Alito,” Green stated, “President Bush gave into the demands of his far-right base and is attempting to replace the moderate O’Connor with someone who would move the court in a direction that threatens fundamental freedoms, including a woman’s right to choose as guaranteed by Roe v. Wade.”
Samuel Alito’s record reveals troubling elements that place him well outside the mainstream, and in direct contrast to Oregonians, who overwhelming support personal freedom and civil liberties:
· Alito took pains to distance himself from the longstanding constitutional requirement that abortion restrictions must have exceptions when a woman's health is in jeopardy. He did so when ruling on a law that effectively banned abortion as early as the 12th week of pregnancy and lacked an exception to protect women’s health. The health exception is a fundamental tenet of Roe v. Wade, and the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments about the need for the health exception this fall. If Alito is in place to vote on this case, instead of the balanced O’Connor, this fundamental right will likely be lost by next summer.
· Alito has argued that significant restrictions on a woman’s right to choose are constitutional. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Alito argued that all of the proposed law’s restrictions on a woman’s right to choose – including a spousal-notification provision struck down by the Third Circuit and, later, the Supreme Court – were constitutional. Alito dissented in part because he would have gone even further than the rest of the court to restrict women’s rights.
· Alito would uphold state laws that place significant roadblocks in the way of women seeking abortion care. Alito concurred with the majority’s opinion in Casey that concluded that “time delay, higher cost, reduced availability, and forcing the woman to receive information she has not sought,” although admittedly “potential burdens,” could not “be characterized as an undue burden.” This opinion practically ensures that he would never find any burden to be undue – a slap in the face to all women, and a serious danger for those seeking reproductive health care.
“Instead of unifying the country, President Bush has chosen the path of confrontation,”
said Ms. Green “This is a scary announcement, appropriate for Halloween. An Alito appointment is a cruel trick for Oregonians. Sandra Day O’Connor has been the Court’s swing Justice, casting the deciding votes over the years to protect women’s reproductive freedom. Alito’s confirmation could shift the Court in a direction that threatens to eviscerate the core protections for women’s freedom guaranteed by Roe v. Wade, or overturn the decision altogether. We are counting on Oregon Senators Smith and Wyden to oppose this nomination.”
|
